Basic Daylight Exposure in Different Lighting Situations
Lighting/Shadows
Black AND White
Color Theory
JPEG vs. RAW!
JPEG RAW
orig: 496 KB orig: 7.11
Photoshop: 710 KB Photoshop: 1.31MB
orig: 496 KB orig: 7.11
Photoshop: 710 KB Photoshop: 1.31MB
Ding-Ding-Ding, Who Wins?!
In my opinion from the JPEG vs. RAW, I prefer the usual JPEG.
With the JPEG I see more vibrancy, brighter-vivid colors, and my fingers don't look so gross and dark looking like in the RAW photo. Maybe it's because I didn't really know how to edit the RAW photograph in the RAW editor and am more used to working with JPEG picture on Photoshop, so that may have been a reason why I prefer JPEG. The RAW photograph seems darker and reminds me of the movie "The Grudge" for some reason, but it does give more detail of my hair and the wrinkles and lines in it. So partially RAW is good but maybe just not for taking photos of body parts that may have wrinkles or acne you don't want to notice. Like in the JPEG version, my fingers look blended as if perfectly smooth or with foundation or something similar. But overall JPEG is my winner.
With the JPEG I see more vibrancy, brighter-vivid colors, and my fingers don't look so gross and dark looking like in the RAW photo. Maybe it's because I didn't really know how to edit the RAW photograph in the RAW editor and am more used to working with JPEG picture on Photoshop, so that may have been a reason why I prefer JPEG. The RAW photograph seems darker and reminds me of the movie "The Grudge" for some reason, but it does give more detail of my hair and the wrinkles and lines in it. So partially RAW is good but maybe just not for taking photos of body parts that may have wrinkles or acne you don't want to notice. Like in the JPEG version, my fingers look blended as if perfectly smooth or with foundation or something similar. But overall JPEG is my winner.
Camera Review
Artistic Perception Assignment
artistic_perception_assignment_brianna_farner.docx | |
File Size: | 17 kb |
File Type: | docx |